Summary

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor FMC Corporation v. Holliday — Opinion of the Court

Congress' use of the word does not indicate that it directed the deemer clause solely at deceit that it feared state legislatures would practice. Indeed, the Conference Report, in describing the deemer clause, omits the word "purporting," stating, "an employee benefit plan is not to be considered as an insurance company, bank, trust company, or investment company (and is not to be considered as engaged in the business of insurance or banking) for purposes of any State law that regulates insurance companies, insurance contracts, banks, trust companies, or investment companies."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor FMC Corporation v. Holliday — Opinion of the Court

Pennsylvania's antisubrogation law prohibits plans from being structured in a manner requiring reimbursement in the event of recovery from a third party. It requires plan providers to calculate benefit levels in Pennsylvania based on expected liability conditions that differ from those in States that have not enacted similar antisubrogation legislation. Application of differing state subrogation laws to plans would therefore frustrate plan administrators' continuing obligation to calculate uniform benefit levels nationwide.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature