Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Sherman v. United States (155 U.S. 673…

The laws of the several states usually recognize the fact that a person, whose name appears upon the registry of a certain precinct, is presumed to be qualified at the next election in that precinct. But even if a complete registration of voters were made by the chief supervisor, no such presumption would follow, since it is the state, and not the general government, which prescribes the qualification of voters.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Sherman v. United States (155 U.S. 673…

No system for the permanent registration of voters was contemplated, simply because the exigencies which dictated the appointment of supervisors for a particular election might not exist at the next or any subsequent election. No permanent official is provided for, except a chief supervisor in each judicial district, who served without regular salary, and acted only when the electoral machinery was put in motion, prior to any election, by the petition of the requisite number of voters.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Sherman v. United States (155 U.S. 673…

No permanent records were contemplated, and, without a system of registration like that obtaining in many of the states, none would be of any value, since persons who are disqualified at one election, by reason of minority, alienage, nonresidence, or other cause, might, when the next election took place, become legal and competent voters.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature