Summary

Hopson v. Texaco Inc — Opinion of the Court

We think those principles apply with equal force here. These seamen were in the service of the ship and the ill-fated journey to Port of Spain was a vital part of the ship's total operations. The ship could not sail with these two men, nor could it lawfully discharge them without taking them to the United States Consul. Indeed, to have abandoned them would have breached the statutory duty to arrange for their return to the United States. Getting these two ill seamen to the United States Consul's office was, therefore, the duty of respondent.
Source: Wikisource

Hopson v. Texaco Inc — Opinion of the Court

In order to give 'an accommodating scope * * * to the word 'agents" (id., at 330-331, 78 S.Ct. at 762) , we concluded that 'when (an) * * * employee's injury is caused in whole or in part by the fault of others performing, under contract, operational activities of his employer, such others are 'agents' of the employer within the meaning of § 1 of FELA.' (Id., at 331-332, 78 S.Ct. at 763) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature