Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black District of Columbia v. Little…

At one extreme the District argues that the Fourth Amendment has no application whatever to inspections and investigations made by health officers; that to preserve the public health, officers may without judicial warrants enter premises, public buildings and private residences at any reasonable hour, with or without the owner's consent. At the opposite extreme, it is argued that no sanitary inspection can ever be made by health officers without a search warrant, except with a property owner's consent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black District of Columbia v. Little…

Applying this policy, we find it unnecessary to decide whether the Fourth Amendment required a search warrant here. For even if the Health Officer had a lawful right to inspect the premises without a warrant, we are persuaded that respondent's statements to the officer were not an 'interference' that made her guilty of a misdemeanor under the controlling District law. [1]
The District regulation which respondent was convicted of violating is set out in part below. [2] It requires that occupants of premises in the District shall keep them 'clean and wholesome'
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature