Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Hallenbeck v. Leimert — Opinion of the Court

The Ashland Bank is not seeking to enforce rules of the clearing house. It asks that proper effect be given to actual payment made through compliance with those rules. The duty of the drawee bank was either to pay or refuse to pay when the holder presented and demanded final payment of the checks. It paid them. The tentative payments became final-as much so as if money had passed. No objection is made to the clearing house rules and we find none.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Hallenbeck v. Leimert — Opinion of the Court

Respondent, receiver of Central Bank, brought suit against petitioner, receiver of Ashland Bank, in the District Court, Northern District of Illinois, to recover upon five checks drawn upon the former and indorsed by the latter bank. Jury having been waived, the trial court made findings of fact with conclusions of law and entered judgment in favor of respondent here for the sum demanded. There is no bill of exceptions
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature