Summary

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Hanson v. Lessee of Eustace — Opinion of the Court

We do not say that keeping back property from an assignment is alone evidence of fraud-our opinion is founded on all the circumstances of the case which are in evidence, of which one of great weight in our minds is the entire want of any attempt at explanation of matters which throw the burden of proof on the defendants. It is a bold requisition on a jury to make presumptions of facts merely from papers which contain only the declarations and recitals of the party who makes them, where direct proofs of the facts can be made if the parties desired to make it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Hanson v. Lessee of Eustace — Opinion of the Court

Before a court can instruct a jury to presume a grant or deed for land, time or length of possession must be shown, which, of itself, in certain cases, and in other cases, in connection with circumstances, will induce the presumption of a grant as a matter of law, or as a legal effect from evidence, which the jury is instructed to make, if in its consideration of the evidence the jury believe it to be true.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Hanson v. Lessee of Eustace — Opinion of the Court

Should he obtain a judgment at law, an execution gives him all the fruits of a decree in equity-the different modes of proceeding being but the varied means of effecting the same object. We are, therefore, of opinion, that the filing and pending of the plaintiff's bill in equity does not, in law, impair his rights to proceed by ejectment to recover the property now in dispute, any more than bringing and prosecuting the present action would prevent him from prosecuting his bill in equity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature