Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Noto v. United States — Opinion of the Court

There must be some substantial direct or circumstantial evidence of a call to violence now or in the future which is both sufficiently strong and sufficiently pervasive to lend color to the otherwise ambiguous theoretical material regarding Communist Party teaching, and to justify the inference that such a call to violence may fairly be imputed to the Party as a whole, and not merely to some narrow segment of it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Noto v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Surely the offhand remarks that certain individuals hostile to the Party would one day be shot cannot demonstrate more than the venomous or spiteful attitude of the Party towards its enemies, and might indicate what could be expected from the Party if it should ever succeed to power. The 'industrial concentration' program, as to which the witness Regan testified in some detail, does indeed come closer to the kind of concrete and particular program on which a criminal conviction in this sort of case must be based.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature