Summary

Portrait of Joseph Story Joseph Story Thornton v. Bank of Washington…

Each note is considered as a distinct substantive transaction. If no more than the legal interest is taken upon the time the new note has to run, the actual application of the proceeds of the new note to the payment of the former note, before it becomes due, does not of itself make the transaction usurious. Something more must occur. There must be a contract between the bank and the party at the time of such discount, that the party shall not have the use or benefit of the proceeds until the former note becomes due, or that the bank shall have the use and benefit of them in the mean time.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Joseph Story Joseph Story Thornton v. Bank of Washington…

The loan was made on a note payable in sixty days, which with the days of grace made it a loan for sixty-three days, and the bank had received the interest in advance by way of discount for sixty-four days.
The legislation of all mankind has been against usury; and the legislation of Maryland has been desirous and vigilant to suppress it. The principle in all courts acting under these laws has been, that if usury was found to have been taken, the wit of man would not evade the statute.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature