Summary

Louis Brandeis Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust Savings Company v…

It is true that the courts of a state have the supreme power to interpret and declare the written and unwritten laws of the state; that this court's power to review decisions of state courts is limited to their decisions on federal questions; [6] and that the mere fact that a state court has rendered an erroneous decision on a question of state law, or has overruled principles or doctrines established by previous decisions on which a party relied, does not give rise to a claim under the Fourteenth Amendment or otherwise confer appellate jurisdiction on this court.
Source: Wikisource

Louis Brandeis Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust Savings Company v…

No one doubted the authority of the Laclede Case until it was expressly overruled in the case at bar. [2] While the defendant's answer asserted that the plaintiff had not availed itself of the administrative remedies under articles 3 and 5 of chapter 119 by application to the boards of equalization and was guilty of laches in not so doing (contentions which the state court held to be unsound) , the answer significantly omitted any contention that there had been a remedy by application to the state tax commission, whose powers are dealt with in the intervening article 4.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature