Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar

Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Peake v. City Of New Orleans…

To say after this contribution of the city to this fund,-a contribution without consideration except in discharge of its debt to the fund,-that because it was not expressed that the contribution was to be taken as in discharge of the indebtedness, a court of equity will permit the contractor or its assignees to treat the contribution as a donation, and charge the contributor as a debtor, would be a mockery of justice, and an insult to equity. It must be borne in mind that a city is not like a private individual, with absolute freedom of contract and donation.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Peake v. City Of New Orleans…

The Davidson decision would wreck every work of a like character we ever knew. The entire levee systems of the Mississippi river would be swept away at once, for the taxes would be void as to all lands above overflow from the river unleveed, and as to all those which lie so low as to remain wet and untillable in the absence of a supplemental system of drainage, even after the completion of the levees. Admit the principle that these general assessments or taxes are to be brought to the test of particular benefits, and the most unexpected and disastrous consequences would follow.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Peake v. City Of New Orleans…

We rather place it upon the other ground, that a municipality which abandons a contemplated and intended work of public improvements, assumes thereby no obligation to any parties who have invested on the faith and expectation of benefit from the completion of the work. When a city or state contracts with an individual or company for the doing of certain work, the right remains to the contracting parties, at any time, to abandon that work.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature