Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Arbuckle v. Blackburn — Opinion of the Court

Reference to the Constitution to strengthen objections to a particular construction, or the pursuit of a certain course of conduct, is not sufficient to invoke jurisdiction. Whatever grounds of equity interposition may have existed here,-and we express no opinion on that subject,-the jurisdiction of the circuit court as a court of the United States depended alone on diverse citizenship.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller Arbuckle v. Blackburn — Opinion of the Court

In the present case the circuit court had jurisdiction on the ground of diverse citizenship; but it is now contended that jurisdiction also rested on the ground that the suit was one arising under the Constitution of the United States.
The rule is firmly established that a suit does not so arise unless it really and substantially involves a dispute or controversy as to the effect or construction of the Constitution, upon the determination of which the result depends, and which appears on the record by a statement in legal and logical form, such as is required in good pleading.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature