Summary

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller In re Hien — Opinion of the Court

The general rule undoubtedly is that courts of justice possess the inherent power to make and frame reasonable rules not conflicting with express statute; but, apart from that, we think it clear that the court of appeals was duly authorized by section 6 of the act creating the court, as well as by section 6 as amended by the act of July 30, 1894, to make rules limiting the time of taking appeals to the court from the decisions of the commissioner of patents.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Melville Fuller Melville Fuller In re Hien — Opinion of the Court

In all cases, where there is no opposing party, a copy of the bill shall be served on the commissioner; and all the expenses of the proceeding shall be paid by the applicant, whether the final decision is in his favor or not.'
Sections 6 and 9 of the act to establish the court of appeals for the District of Columbia, approved February 9, 1893 (26 Stat. 434, c. 74) , provided:
Sec. 6.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature