Summary

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Bergdoll v. Pollock — Opinion of the Court

Experience has demonstrated what the ordinary production from a given quantity of material is. If the production as shown by the books differed from that which ordinarily would be the yield of the material purchased, the burden, as the law then stood, was cast upon the manufacturer after a reassessment to account for the discrepancy. It is unnecessary now to decide whether this rule of evidence has been changed by the 'Act to define the tax on fermented or malt liquors,' passed May 13, 1876.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Bergdoll v. Pollock — Opinion of the Court

His books show, or ought to show, every thing that he has produced; and, in an investigation of this kind, if he shows that his returns or stamps fully equal the amount of his production, the burden will then b on the government to show a deficiency.' An honest manufacturer who has kept accurate books has always at hand the ready means of establishing the fact of his compliance with the law.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature