Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Atkins v. Disintegrating Company…

A civil cause of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction is prosecuted by a suit. It is within the terms of the restriction as closely as a cause 'where an alien sues for a tort.' It was wholly unnecessary, in the restrictive clause, to recite again the several terms previously employed, as suits for forfeitures, suits against consuls, suits at common law, &c., and civil causes in admiralty. These are all civil in their nature. A cause in admiralty is so expressly described. It is a civil cause.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Atkins v. Disintegrating Company…

The eleventh section of the Judiciary Act does not extend to 'causes civil and maritime' in the court of admiralty. It embraces only 'suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity,' which are specified in the first clause of the section.
It has not been usual to consider admiralty causes as included in practice legislation, unless specified. Admiralty proceedings are sui generis, and there are other instances in which language has been used in the statutes, which at first reading would seem to include them, but which the courts have held not to include them.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Atkins v. Disintegrating Company…

That the Circuit and District Courts of the United States cannot send their process into another district, in suits at common law or in equity, and thereby obtain jurisdiction of the person, is also clear. That, in actions at the common law or in equity, they cannot proceed by attachment, and so obtain jurisdiction of a person who is an inhabitant of another district, is settled.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature