Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Meguire v. Corwine — Opinion of the Court

After the views of the court were announced, it was too late for the plaintiff to change his position and claim for the jury the right to wander at large in the field of conjecture and find as a fact what the evidence wholly failed to establish, and which, if found, would have thrown on the court the necessity to set aside the verdict and award a new trial.
A judge has no right to submit a question where the state of the evidence forbids it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Meguire v. Corwine — Opinion of the Court

That which is bad destroys that which is good, and they perish together. . . . Where the taint exists it affects fatally, in all its parts, the entire body of the contract. In all such cases potior conditio defendentis. Where there is turpitude, the law will help neither party.' These remarks apply here. The contract is clearly illegal, and this action was brought to enforce it. This conclusion renders it unnecessary to consider the plaintiff's other assignments of error.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature