Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. New Jersey v. New York (283 U.S. 336…

A river is more than an amenity, it is a treasure. It offers a necessity of life that must be rationed among those who have power over it. New York has the physical power to cut off all the water within its jurisdiction. But clearly the exercise of such a power to the destruction of the interest of lower States could not be tolerated. And on the other hand equally little could New Jersey be permitted to require New York to give up its power altogether in order that the river might come down to it undiminished.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. New Jersey v. New York (283 U.S. 336…

New York proposes to divert a large amount of water from the above-named tributaries of the Delaware and from the watershed of that river to the watershed of the Hudson River in order to increase the water supply of the City of New York. New Jersey insists on a strict application of the rules of the common law governing private riparian proprietors subject to the same sovereign power. Pennsylvania intervenes to protect its interests as against anything that might be done to prejudice its future needs.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature