Summary

Owen J. Roberts Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Company…

As the theory of the revenue acts has been to tax corporate profits to the corporation, and their receipt only when distributed to the stockholders, the purpose of the legislation is to compel the company to distribute any profits not needed for the conduct of its business so that, when so distributed, individual stockholders will become liable not only for normal but for surtax on the dividends received.
Source: Wikisource

Owen J. Roberts Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Company…

The petitioner urges acceptance of the Board's first conclusion that the respondent was a mere holding or investment company. He says that the taxpayer was nothing but a pocketbook for Mr. Prince who, as an individual, managed and controlled the entire enterprise and used the taxpayer merely as a repository of surplus earnings which were intended ultimately to be used for his benefit.
Source: Wikisource

Owen J. Roberts Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Company…

The respondent, with a paid-in cash capital of $1,000,000, purchased [10] the right to receive the net earnings of the enterprise after the payment of the New Jersey Company's fixed charges, operating expenses, and the guaranteed dividends on its stock. The respondent's goal was the acquisition, by the year 1940, of the interest of all others having any capital share in the enterprise, and the method pursued was to accumulate current earnings [11] so that, by 1940, they would be available for such capital investment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature