Summary

Owen J. Roberts Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Company…

Citrus fruit occupies a central and indeed pervasive role in the economy of Florida. That state's well-being is dependent on the cultivation of the citrus crop, its packing, transportation, financing and exporation. The appropriateness of regulations to be adopted for the citrus fruit industry is thus peculiarly a matter for the legislature of Florida in whose keeping is the shaping of that state's social and economic policy.
Source: Wikisource

Owen J. Roberts Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Company…

The allowable exercise of legislative discretion to attain price stability finds obvious occasion in the case of a commodity as basic to a state's economy as citrus fruit is to that of Florida. Certainly neither in the bill nor in the Court's opinion is a reason vouchsafed to take the present suit out of the scope of the Nebbia doctrine. The wisdom of such a policy-its efficacy to achieve the desired ends-is of course not our concern.
Source: Wikisource

Owen J. Roberts Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Company…

The appellees' principal attack upon the statute, based upon the Constitution, centers on its regulation of prices. The mere fact that the act fixes prices is, in itself insufficient to invalidate it; [4] and allegation of that fact does not raise substantial federal questions. The presumption that an act fixing prices is constitutional would require the denial of a temporary injunction, except in extraordinary situations. Findings to support a conclusion against constitutionality would need to be unequivocal.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature