Summary

Pierce Butler Minneapolis St. Company v. Borum…

The misrepresentation and injury may not be regarded as unrelated contemporary facts. As a result of his concealment his status was at all times wrongful, a fraud upon the petitioner, and a peril to its patrons and its other employees. Right to recover may not justly or reasonably be rested on a foundation so abhorrent to public policy.'
Here, defendant could not have regarded the difference between plaintiff's actual age and that stated in his application as having any material bearing upon the physical condition it required.
Source: Wikisource

Pierce Butler Minneapolis St. Company v. Borum…

The court said (page 414 of 279 U.S., 49 S.C.t. 363, 365) : 'The deception * * * set at naught the carrier's reasonable rule and practice established to promote the safety of employees and to protect commerce. It was directly opposed to the public interest, because calculated to embarrass and hinder the carrier in the performance of its duties and to defeat important purposes sought to be advanced by the act.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature