“ That is, if Wikipedia pleases and the misguided are silenced. After all, when porn stars are okay with Wikipidia, how come unheralded authors become a taboo? Just think once more and restore the pages for the deletions have been affected even without giving a hearing. It pays to appreciate there always could be a second opinion, and that wisdom lies in acting after sizing both sides of the coin. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BS Murthy (talk • contribs) 04:30, 26 January 2006. ”

“ Delete - B.S. The purpose of wikisource isn't to assist the cause of literature or to provide an advertising forum for new & unpublished authors. Maybe your works do merit a wider audience but it isn't here. AllanHainey 08:35, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Rejoineder from BS Murthy; The advocates chorusing deletion seem to miss the point that Wikisource is meant to be "The Free Library". What does a library contain than the catalogue of books? What is presented in the sought to be deleted pages is only information relevant to the books under question. ”

“ Anyone remember?—Zhaladshar (Talk) 22:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC) I'm new here (sort of) , and an admin on Wikipedia. I'd personally say that you guys shouldn't be a dumping ground for Wikipedia. I agree that if it isn't published, then delete it. Otherwise you'll be getting all sorts of crappy (and buggy!) source code. Wikisource, IMO, was never designed to be a code source repository. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC) Maybe the Wiki Empire ought to have a site for computer code, manned by Admins who know about it and can police it properly. ”

“ Template:Backlink Another Template Only used on one page and doesn't conform. Delete --BirgitteSB 22:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
I think it would be a very good idea to have such a template (not necessarily this one) for author back links. I've read in at least one place where Zhaladshar (Talk) has mentioned that people remove the "<" character from back links because they think it is a mistake. The use of a template would standardize things and naturally they can be easily improved or changed. —Droll 00:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC) Delete - I don't think its necessary to keep this template. ”

“ They contribute nothing in terms of textual content. Wikisource does not allow this sort of submission.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 05:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Reconsider the position To seek deletion of those pages that tell about an unheralded author and his works in a world of commercial publishing is to hurt the cause of literature itself. ”

“ Delete. --BirgitteSB 19:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete; I orphaned the template and the proposal has been up for more than the required week. // Pathoschild (editor / talk) 12:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Deleted.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 22:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC) Others This is a very useful exercise and ought to be expanded. Pitch in guys, please. It strikes me that while most relate to templates for text pages, there are also templates useful on users' talk pages and also for adding to WP to link with WS. I will be off-line in a bit, but later I will try to classify them. ”

“ Deleted.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 01:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Lists of Palestinian children killed Transwiki:List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2000 Transwiki:List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2001 Transwiki:List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2002 Transwiki:List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2003 Transwiki:List of Palestinian children killed by Israelis in 2004 These lists are by no means source texts and do not belong here.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 21:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nominator. ”