Reginald Crundall Punnett

Summary

Reginald Crundall Punnett Mimicry in Butterflies — Chapter II (1915)

On the theory of mimicry all the members of both of these groups must be regarded as specially protected owing to their conspicuous coloration and distasteful properties. What advantage then can an Ithomiine be supposed to gain by mimicking a Heliconine, or vice versâ? Why should a species exchange its own bright and conspicuous warning pattern for one which is neither brighter nor more conspicuous?
Source: Wikisource

Reginald Crundall Punnett Mimicry in Butterflies — Chapter II (1915)

What advantage then have the Ithomiines over the majority of butterflies in those parts? They are small insects, rather flimsy in build, with comparatively weak powers of flight, and yet so conspicuously coloured that they can hardly be mistaken for anything else. In spite of all this they are little subject to the attacks of enemies such as birds, and Bates attributed this to the fact that the juices of their bodies are unpalatable. According to him their striking and conspicuous pattern is of the nature of a warning coloration, advertising their disagreeable properties to possible enemies.
Source: Wikisource

Reginald Crundall Punnett Mimicry in Butterflies — Chapter II (1915)

Wallace was the next after Bates to interest himself in mimicry and, from his study of the butterflies of the Oriental region [2] , shewed that in this part of the world too there existed these remarkable resemblances between species belonging to different families. Perhaps the most important part of Wallace's contribution was the demonstration that in some species not only was it the female alone that "mimicked" but that there might be several different forms of female mimicking different models, and in some cases all unlike the male of their own species.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature