Summary

Richard John Santorum 150 Cong. Rec. S7980 - Federal Marriage Amendment - Motion to Proceed - Resumed… (2004)

You can say I am a hater, but I will argue that I am a lover. I am a lover of traditional family and children who deserve the right to have a mother and a father. Don’t we want that? Is there anyone in the U.S. Senate who will stand up and argue that children don’t have a right to a mom and a dad; that our society shouldn’t be saying to all people that moms and dads are the best, an ideal, and what we should strive for? When we say that marriage is not that, then we say that children don’t deserve that.
Source: Wikisource

Richard John Santorum 150 Cong. Rec. S7980 - Federal Marriage Amendment - Motion to Proceed - Resumed… (2004)

I ask kids today what marriage is about. For the longest time, when I asked them what marriage is about, they always answered it is about the love of two people. Look at what Hollywood said about marriage. If you look at what leaders in this country say about marriage, maybe that is what we think it is. You look at the pop stars and celebrities, and that is certainly what it is today. It certainly isn’t about families and kids.
What are we telling our children? Is marriage just about affirming the love of two people?
Source: Wikisource

Richard John Santorum 150 Cong. Rec. S7980 - Federal Marriage Amendment - Motion to Proceed - Resumed… (2004)

Let me assure you, if we do not stop the change of the definition of traditional marriage, if we let marriage be just a social convention without meaning or without significance, we will shrink government because we have seen where marriage becomes out of favor—whether it is the Netherlands or Scandinavia, which I will talk about in a moment, or whether it is subcultures within this country in which marriage is seen as an out-of- date convention. In those cultures, children suffer. In those cultures, people do not get married.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature