Summary

Portrait of Robert Cooper Grier Robert Cooper Grier Randon v. Toby — Opinion of the Court

The use of the word 'note,' in the singular number, instead of 'notes,' is so palpable a slip of the pen, that its use, although furnishing an opportunity for cavil, could not be said to create an ambiguity on the face of the instrument, or leave any doubt as to its true intent in the mind of any one who will read the whole of it together, and has no intent or desire to pervert it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Cooper Grier Robert Cooper Grier Randon v. Toby — Opinion of the Court

The buying and selling of negroes, in a State where slavery is tolerated, and where color is prim a facie evidence that such is the status of the person, cannot be said to be an illegal contract, and void on that account. The crime committed by those who introduced the negroes into the country does not attach to all those who may afterwards purchase them. It is true that the negroes may possibly, by the laws of Texas, be entitled to their freedom on that account. If the defendant had shown that the negroes had sued out their freedom in the courts of Texas, it would have been a good defence.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Cooper Grier Robert Cooper Grier Randon v. Toby — Opinion of the Court

The proper province of the court is to construe the words of a written instrument; the proper province of the jury is to try and find facts, but not the legal meaning and effect of writings.
This instruction as moved ought to have been rejected totally. That the court erred in giving an instruction on the motion of the defendant Randon, beneficial to him and not to his prejudice, is not assignable for error by him upon his writ of error.
As this seventh bill of exceptions has been mentioned, the other point of exception contained in it may be disposed of.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature