Rutgers v. Waddington (1784)
“ But when a law is expressed in general words, and some collateral matter, which happens to arise from those general words, is unreasonable, there the judges are in decency to conclude, that the consequences were not foreseen by the legislature; and therefore they are at liberty to expound the statute by equity, and only quoad hoc to disregard it.When the judicial make these distinctions, they do not control the legislature; they endeavor to give their intention its proper effect. ”
