Summary

Portrait of Salmon P. Chase Salmon P. Chase Sparrow v. Strong (70 U.S. 97)…

It is not worth while to be so lost in the technique of the law-in the verbality of clerical 'entries'-as to forget 'that words are the daughters of earth and things the sons of heaven.'
It seems that there was no 'assignment of errors.' The judgment was probably affirmed for want of one. But as the record stands, this court rests in ignorance of the ground on which the judgment proceeded; and the case stands here simply as a writ of error to bring before this court for revision the decision of the Supreme Court of Nevada, upon a motion for a new trial.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Salmon P. Chase Salmon P. Chase Sparrow v. Strong (70 U.S. 97)…

Its value depends upon the course which the government may pursue in asserting or omitting to assert its right of ownership. Whatever the occupant may hope for or even expect; whatever the government may in the benignant course of its dealings see fit hereafter to do by such a person, it is plain that he has neither right, title, interest, claim, nor demand in or to the property in suit. Such an estate, or no-estate as it more truly is, cannot be estimated in the sense which the law requires to give jurisdiction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature