Summary

Portrait of Robert Cooper Grier Robert Cooper Grier Freeborn v. Smith — Opinion of the Court

Essex Bank, [16] 'there is no such thing as a vested right to do wrong, and the legislature which, in its acts, not expressly authorized by the Constitution, limits itself to correcting mistakes and to providing remedies for the furtherance of justice, cannot be charged with violating its duty, or exceeding its authority.' Such acts are of a remedial character, and are the peculiar subjects of legislation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Cooper Grier Robert Cooper Grier Freeborn v. Smith — Opinion of the Court

If it comes within the category of retrospective legislation, as has been argued, we find nothing in the Constitution limiting the power of Congress to amend or correct omissions in previous acts. It is well settled that where there is no direct constitutional prohibition, a State may pass retrospective laws, such as, in their operation, may affect suits pending, and give to a party a remedy which he did not previously possess, or modify an existing remedy, or remove an impediment in the way of legal proceedings.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature