Summary

Samuel Blatchford Martin v. Barbour — Opinion of the Court

The judgment or decree of the court confirming said sale shall operate as a complete bar against any and all persons who may hereafter claim said lands in consequence of informality mality or illegality in the proceedings; and the title to said land shall be considered as confirmed and complete in the purchaser thereof, his heirs and assigns, forever; saving, however, to infants, persons of unsound mind, imprisoned, beyond seas, or out of the jurisdiction of the United States, the right to appear and contest the title to said land within one year after their disabilities may be removed.
Source: Wikisource

Samuel Blatchford Martin v. Barbour — Opinion of the Court

In the present case the plaintiffs in the cross-bill proved such failure to the satisfaction of the circuit court. By section 577, Mansf. Dig. 1884, before referred to, the purchaser is required to publish a notice 'calling on all persons who can set up any right to the lands so purchased, in consequence of any informality or any irregularity or illegality connected with such sale,' to show cause why the sale should not be confirmed.
Source: Wikisource

Samuel Blatchford Martin v. Barbour — Opinion of the Court

The appellant took his deed for the land in the same condition in which the state held it, and subject to the same equites and defenses. The state, having created its bureau of taxes, is bound to see to it that its officers impart correct information to parties dealing with it and do not mislead them. The mother of the minors had the right to acknowledge, as she did, her trusteeship for them. The minors are the real parties in interest in the case, and they have appeared and contested the title to the lot, within the right reserved to them by section 581.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature