Samuel Freeman Miller

Samuel Freeman Miller

Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Moore v. Robbins (96 U.S. 530)…

At all events, we are entirely satisfied that the lands in controversy were subject to sale at public auction at the time Moore and Mitchell bid for and bought them; that the sale so made was by law a valid one, vesting in them the equitable title, with right to receive the patents, and that the subsequent proceedings of Bunn to enter the land as a pre-emptor were unlawful and void.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Moore v. Robbins (96 U.S. 530)…

No man could buy of the grantee with safety, because he could only convey subject to the right of the officers of the government to annul his title.
If such a power exists, when does it cease? There is no statute of limitations against the government; and if this right to reconsider and annul a patent after it has once become perfect exists in the Executive Department, it can be exercised at any time, however remote.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Moore v. Robbins (96 U.S. 530)…

While conceding for the present, to the fullest extent, that when there is a question of contested right between private parties to receive from the United States a patent for any part of the public land, it belongs to the head of the Land Department to decide that question, it is equally clear that when the patent has been awarded to one of the contestants, and has been issued, delivered, and accepted, all right to control the title or to decide on the right to the title has passed from the land-office.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature