“ This makes me think raw either defaults to no watermark or there is no way to get watermarks for that format (which makes sense) . It also makes me think you are not downloading raw images (perhaps because you are not allowed to) . —Uzume (talk) 08:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC) Inductiveload and Uzume: Not being allowed to download makes sense. If that is the case, downloading each page as pdf (like I have been doing, limited by being an easily distracted human) so local software can dissemble and reassemble the desired pieces. ”
Summary
“Scan Lab/Archives/2022-12”, is a work by . It explores elements such as watermarks, File and Xover.
Quotes from Scan Lab/Archives/2022-12 ()
“ Xover: If you’re better with DJVU, then that’s fine with me. “TASJ” is fine as a shortening. I don’t think 1964 should be used vs. 1874 because (1) the 1964 reprint is an exact reprint, without editing, and (2) there are actual volumes of TASJ first published in 1964. I just think that 1874 is clearer in this case. TE (æ) A,ea. (talk) 02:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC) @TE (æ) A,ea.: Uploaded to File:TASJ-1-1-2.djvu (minimal quality control, bare bones info template) . I uploaded it to Commons because their cutoff for just assuming PD even absent firm author info is pub. ”
“ I can't remember if there was a preference toggle for this, but I think it should be there by default. (Special:Import is restricted to accounts with the relevant permissions, but the "Export to Commons" thing is a separate function.) But in any case, if you run into trouble using it just drop a note here and I can do it. Xover (talk) 06:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC) Xover: Thank you! I was able to export it, and it has now been proofread and transcluded. Would you mind deleting the original file? ”
