Summary

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v…

The problem does not disappear by invoking a solving phrase, 'regulation, not absolute prohibition.' The Commerce Clause sought to put an end to the economic autarchy of the States. It is not for Michigan to determine what competition she will or will not allow from without, subject, of course, to her right to protect those State interests which are implied by the now threadbare phrase that interstate commerce must also pay its way, or to protect local interests that only incidentally or insignificantly touch interstate or foreign commerce.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sherman Minton Sherman Minton Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v…

We have emphasized repeatedly that Congress meant to create a comprehensive and effective regulatory scheme, complementary in its operation to those of the states and in no manner usurping their authority. * * * And, as was pointed out in Federal Power Comm. v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. (591) at page 610, 64 S.Ct. (281) at page 291 (88 L.Ed. 333) , 'the primary aim of this legislation was to protect consumers against exploitation at the hands of natural gas companies.' The scheme was one of co-operative action between federal and state agencies.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature