Smith Thompson,
Elliott v. Swartwout — Opinion of the Court
“ But it is said the collector was an agent. He is agent of the law, to carry its provisions into effect. He is not an agent for any illegal purposes; and he is bound to disregard instructions from the department of the government having charge of the collection of the revenue, if they are contrary to law. If a collector is an agent of the treasury, then he is not an agent of the law of the land.The collector is responsible as a principal, when he compels the payment of duties; and he must answer to an injured individual for his actions. This is responsibility from which he cannot escape. ”
