Summary

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Ford Motor Company v. Department of Treasury of Indiana…

Since the state legislature may waive state immunity only by general law, it is not to be presumed in the absence of clear language to the contrary, that they conferred on administrative or executive officers discretionary power to grant or withhold consent in individual cases. Nor do we think that any of the general or special powers conferred by statute on the Indiana attorney general to appear and defend actions brought against the state or its officials can be deemed to confer on that officer power to consent to suit against the state in courts when the state has not consented to be sued.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Ford Motor Company v. Department of Treasury of Indiana…

State court decisions construe strictly the statutory powers conferred on the Indiana state attorney general and hold that he exercises only those powers 'delegated' to him by statute and does not possess the powers of an attorney general at 'common law.' [14] It would seem, therefore, that no properly authorized executive or administrative officer of the state has waived the state's immunity to suit in the federal courts.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stanley Forman Reed Stanley Forman Reed Ford Motor Company v. Department of Treasury of Indiana…

We are of the opinion that petitioner's suit in the instant case against the department and the individuals as the board constitutes an action against the State of Indiana. A state statute prescribed the procedure for obtaining refund of taxes illegally exacted, providing that a taxpayer first file a timely application for a refund with the state department of treasury.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature