Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Dow v. Johnson — Opinion of the Court

A feeling of intense hostility against the government of the Union prevailed, as before, with the people, which was ready to break out into insurrection upon the appearance of the enemy in force, or upon the withdrawal of our troops. The country was under martial law; and its armed occupation gave no jurisdiction to the civil tribunals over the officers and soldiers of the occupying army.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Dow v. Johnson — Opinion of the Court

The important question thus presented for our determination is, whether an officer of the army of the United States is liable to a civil action in the local tribunals for injuries resulting from acts ordered by him in his military character, whilst in the service of the United States, in the enemy's country, upon an allegation of the injured party that the acts were not justified by the necessities of war.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature