Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field More v. Steinbach — Opinion of the Court

In determining claims under Mexican grants the board of land commissioners was required by the act under which it was created to be governed by the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the law of nations, the laws, usages, and customs of the government from which the claim was derived, the principles of equity and the decisions of the supreme court of the United States, so far as they were applicable.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field More v. Steinbach — Opinion of the Court

Certain it is that a claimant presenting his claim to the board for examination and confirmation, in order that he might subsequently acquire a patent from the government, is bound by the adjudication of the board. After submitting his claim to its examination and judgment, he cannot afterwards be heard to say that in adjudicating upon his title the board erred, or that the land department in determining the boundaries of his claim erred, in order that he may claim outside of the survey and patent other lands which he considers covered by his grant.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field More v. Steinbach — Opinion of the Court

By the session of California to the United States, the rights of the inhabitants to their property were not affected. They remained as before. Political jurisdiction and sovereignty over the territory and public property alone passed to the United States. U.S. v. Percheman, 7 Pet. 51, 87. Previous to the cession numerous grants of land in California had been made by the Spanish and Mexican governments to private parties. Some of these were of tracts with defined boundaries; some were for specific quantities of land to be selected from areas containing a much larger quantity
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature