Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field,  Noonan v. Bradley — Opinion of the Court

“ But here there is no inconsistency in the pleas; the one denying any right in the plaintiff, in his capacity as administrator, to the subject of controversy, and the other the release of the defendant from liability on the bond in suit by failure of its consideration. The averments of both may be true.
The proposition of law which the counsel invokes, that a plea to the merits admits the representative character of the plaintiff, and his right to sue in that capacity, is only applicable where no other plea than one of that kind is interposed
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field,  Noonan v. Bradley — Opinion of the Court

“ If there were any doubt as to the construction which should be given to the agreement of the intestate, that construction should be adopted which would be more to the advantage of the defendant, upon the general ground that a party, who takes an agreement prepared by another, and upon its faith incurs obligations or parts with his property, should have a construction given to the instrument favorable to him ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature