Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Northern Pacific Company v. Herbert…

The general doctrine as to the exemption of an employer from liability for injuries to a servant caused by the negligence of a fellow-servant, in a common employment, is well settled. When several persons are thus employed there is necessarily incident to the service of each the risk that the others may fail in that care and vigilance which are essential to his safety.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Northern Pacific Company v. Herbert…

As to the alleged negligence of the plaintiff only a few words need be said. Of course he was bound to exercise care to avoid injuries to himself. If he had known, or might have known by ordinary attention, the condition of the brakes and cars when he mounted the cars, and thus exposed himself to danger,-in other words, if he did not use his senses as men generally use theirs to keep from harm,-he cannot complain of the injury which he suffered.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field Northern Pacific Company v. Herbert…

What case is more distinctly within section 1131 than one where a railroad company fails to appoint some one to provide and maintain machinery and appliances safe and suitable for use by its employes, or where its agent or employe, appointed to that duty, does not exercise ordinary care in its discharge? Such an agent or employe is, of necessity, the representative of the corporation, and his want of ordinary care in respect of such matters is negligence upon the part of the corporation itself.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature