Supreme Court of the State of California

Summary

Supreme Court of the State of California Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Psychological Association

Crucial to the theory of liability plaintiffs advance is the judgment that plaintiffs should not be held responsible for their decision to join the Unification Church and for any resulting consequences. Vindication of this claim would unleash a concept with enormous subversive potential. That persons should, in all but the rarest circumstances, be held responsible for their actions is the bedrock of both our criminal and civil jurisprudence.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of the State of California Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Psychological Association

Roy, official regulation may interfere with conduct motivated by religious belief only if the regulation is necessary to achieve certain compelling governmental interests. "The essence of all that has been said and written on the subject is that only those interests of the highest order and those not otherwise served can overbalance legitimate claims to the free exercise of religion."
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature