T. S. Eliot

T. S. Eliot

Summary

Portrait of T. S. Eliot T. S. Eliot The Criterion (1926)

It is not merely that there is not enough good literature, even good second-rate literature, to fill the pages of any review; or that in a purely literary review the work of a man of genius may appear almost side by side with some miserable counterfeit of his own style. The profounder objection is the impossibility of defining the frontiers, or limiting the context of 'literature'. Even the purest literature is alimented from non-literary sources, and has non-literary consequences. Pure literature is a chimera of sensation
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of T. S. Eliot T. S. Eliot The Criterion (1926)

We must then take the vague but quite adequate concept of literature as the beautiful expression of particular sensation and perception, general emotion and impersonal ideas, merely as the centre from which we move; and form a literary review, not merely on literature, but on what we may suppose to be the interests of any intelligent person with literary taste.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of T. S. Eliot T. S. Eliot The Criterion (1926)

Of messianic literature we have sufficient.
From what has been said it should appear that the ideal literary review will depend upon a nice adjustment between editor, collaborators and occasional contributors. Such an adjustment must issue in a 'tendency' rather than a 'programme'. A programme is a fragile thing, the more dogmatic the more fragile. An editor or a collaborator may change his mind; internal discord breaks out; and there is an end to the programme or to the group. But a tendency will endure, unless editor and collaborators change not only their minds but their personalities.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature