Summary

The State (Ryan) v Lennon (1936)

“ It is true it is a despotism of the many, of the majority, if you choose to call it so, but it is none the less a despotism. It may well be doubted if at man is to hold all that he is accustomed to call his own, all in which he has placed his happiness, and the security of which is essential to that happiness, under the unlimited dominion of others, whether it is not wiser that this power should be exercised by one man than by many. The theory of our Governments, State and National, is opposed to the deposit of unlimited power anywhere. ”
Source: Wikisource

The State (Ryan) v Lennon (1936)

“ Most certainly that power is not given to the Oireachtas to exercise at its own will and pleasure. On the contrary, by a mandatory prohibition in the clearest and most explicit terms, it is forbidden to make any amendment of the Constitution after the specified date without the co-operation of the people, to whom alone the effective decision to make or not to make any proposed amendment is explicitly and very definitely given by the plain words of the power and sternly reserved. ”
Source: Wikisource

The State (Ryan) v Lennon (1936)

“ The emphatic language of an Article and the universality of its terms are not relevant to the question of the primary or secondary importance of the Article as so worded, or to the question of its alterability. Indeed, overstatement is a natural result of the confidence and exuberance of youth, and may be what most of all necessitates, and most readily yields to, amendment as the Constitution matures. But not alone is the distinction difficult, if not impossible, to draw, but there is nothing in the language of Art. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature