Timothy M. Kenny

Name: Costantino v. City of Detroit
Author: Timothy M. Kenny

Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

Summary

“Costantino v. City of Detroit”, published in 2020, is a work by Timothy M. Kenny. It explores elements such as the TCF Center, audit and challengers.

Quotes from Costantino v. City of Detroit (Timothy M. Kenny)

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ Mr. Sitto's affidavit, while stating a few general facts, is rife with speculation and guess-work about sinister motives. Mr. Sitto knew little about the process of the absentee counting board activity. His sinister motives attributed to the City of Detroit were negated by Christopher Thomas' explanation that all ballots were delivered to the back of Hall E at the TCF Center. Thomas also indicated that the City utilized a rental truck to deliver ballots. There is no evidentiary basis to attribute any evil activity by virtue of the city using a rental truck with out-of-state license plates. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ Plaintiffs renewed their motion for a results audit of Wayne County election results pursuant to Michigan Constitution Article 2, Section 4 (1) (h) . Rather than the original request for an “independent, nonpartisan” audit, they now seek to have the audit conducted by the Wayne County Clerk. Plaintiffs’ request that the Clerk complete the audit before December 14, 2020, the date Michigan Electors are schedule to vote in the Electoral College. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ Plaintiffs must establish they will likely prevail on the merits. Plaintiffs submitted seven affidavits in support of their petition for injunctive relief claiming widespread voter fraud took place at the TCF Center. One of the affidavits also contended that there was blatant voter fraud at one of the satellite officers of the Detroit City Clerk. An additional affidavit supplied by current Republican State Senator and former Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, expressed concern about allegations of voter fraud and urged "Court intervention", as well as an audit of the votes. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ Carone's description of the events at the TCF Center does not square with any of the other affidavits. There are no other reports of lost data, or tabulating machines that jammed repeatedly every hour during the count. Neither Republican nor Democratic challengers nor city officials substantiate her version of events. The allegations simply are not credible. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ Thomas resolved disputes about the processes and satisfactorily reduced the number of challenges raised at the TCF Center.
In determining whether injunctive relief is required, the Court must also determine whether the Plaintiffs sustained their burden of establishing they would suffer irreparable harm if an injunction were not granted. Irreparable harm does not exist if there is a legal remedy provided to Plaintiffs. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6 (C) (2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties." ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations. ”

[↩︎]

Source: Wikisource

Timothy M. Kenny, Costantino v. City of Detroit (2020)

“ Plaintiffs have not supplied any statutory requirement supporting Mr. Gustafson's speculative suspicion of fraud.
Patrick Colbeck's affidavit centered around concern about whether any of the computers at the absent voter counting board were connected to the internet. The answer given by a David Nathan indicated the computers were not connected to the internet. Mr. Colbeck implies that there was internet connectivity of an icon that appeared on one of the computers. Christopher Thomas indicated computers were not connected for workers, only the essential had computer connectivity. Mr. ”

Timothy M. Kenny

Summary

Quotes from Costantino v. City of Detroit (Timothy M. Kenny)

Common terms

Similar works

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature