Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Sicurella v. United States — Opinion of the Court

We believe that Congress had in mind real shooting wars when it referred to participation in war in any form-actual military conflicts between nations of the earth in our time-wars with bombs and bullets, tanks, planes and rockets. We believe the reasoning of the Government in denying petitioner's claim is so far removed from any possible congressional intent that it is erroneous as a matter of law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Sicurella v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The Government insists that petitioner's statements reveal qualified and varied objection to war-and that 'petitioner's willingness to fight in defense of Kingdom interests, particularly when those words are considered in the light of the teachings of his sect, * * *' is clearly not opposition to war in any form.
The Government does not contend that the petitioner's belief in the use of force in self-defense, as well as the defense of his home, family and associates, is so inconsistent with his claim of conscientious objection as to serve as a basis for a denial of his claim.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature