United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

Summary

United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren 357 F.Supp… (1973)

Since Congress in enacting the Federal Trade Commission Act left the states free to establish their own standards and penalties for unfair practices, there is not reason why the outcome of the suit brought by the Federal Trade Commission would have any bearing on plaintiffs' liability under state law. It is well settled that when the same act by an individual violates both state and federal law, both the state and the federal government may act without waiting for the other to finish.
Source: Wikisource

United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren 357 F.Supp… (1973)

But the right not to be barred from a lawful vocation for an unlawful reason does not imply the right to work at what the legislature deems a vocation inimical to the public interest. Plaintiff may respond with Falstaff who met the charge of "purse-taking" with the answer, "But 'tis my vocation Hal, 'tis no sin for a man to labor in his vocation."
Source: Wikisource

United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren 357 F.Supp… (1973)

Often using speech to carry out an illegal course of conduct will immunize the speaker from arrest. For instance, a speaker at an unruly public demonstration may know that continuing his speech will cause a breach of the peace, yet even if the state shows that he intended that result, he cannot be convicted of breach of the peace or attempted breach of the peace as long as his speech itself qualifies for constitutional protection.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature