United States District Court for the District of Oregon

Summary

United States District Court for the District of Oregon,  State of Oregon v. City of Rajneeshpuram… (1984)

“ Franchise Tax Board stands on the most fundamental level simply for the well-established proposition that a party cannot create federal court jurisdiction by anticipating a federal defense to a state law coercive action it could bring itself, with the added twist that this rule stands notwithstanding the fact that the declaratory judgment defendant also might be able to bring a coercive action that does arise under federal law. ”
Source: Wikisource

United States District Court for the District of Oregon,  State of Oregon v. City of Rajneeshpuram… (1984)

“ If anything, a much stronger argument can be made for the State being a more appropriate plaintiff in a case challenging a municipal establishment of religion. The State has a much stronger claim to standing, and more importantly, the State, unlike a citizen-taxpayer, is under a constitutional duty arising from the first amendment and applicable to states under the fourteenth amendment to see that it does not take action constituting an establishment of religion. ”
Source: Wikisource

United States District Court for the District of Oregon,  State of Oregon v. City of Rajneeshpuram… (1984)

“ Where the complaint in an action for declaratory judgment seeks, in essence to assert a defense to an impending or threatened state court action, it is the character of the threatened action, and not of the defense, which will determine whether there is federal-question jurisdiction in the District Court. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature