United States District Court for the District of Oregon

Summary

United States District Court for the District of Oregon State of Oregon v. City of Rajneeshpuram… (1984)

If the facts alleged in the State of Oregon's complaint are true, the court concludes that the potential injury to the anti-establishment principle of the first amendment by the existence and the operation of the City of Rajneeshpuram clearly outweighs the potential harm to defendants' free exercise of religion rights. To deny defendants the right to operate a city is the only means of achieving a compelling state and federal interest -- that of avoiding an establishment of religion.
Source: Wikisource

United States District Court for the District of Oregon State of Oregon v. City of Rajneeshpuram… (1984)

Individuals chosen by the followers of a particular faith to safeguard their spiritual and cultural way of life have been [**21] accorded authority to determine what shall constitute acceptable modes of conduct for Methodists and non-Methodists alike. Government and religion are so inextricably intertwined as to be inseparable from one another.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature