“ The department also claims that respondeat superior is no basis for imputing liability on a City or a superior officer under a § 1983 claim. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976) .12 Finally, defendant contends that allegations 17, 25, and 26 do not allege deliberate indifference to plaintiff's rights under Canton v. Harris.
The Court agrees, and for the same reasons articulated in the previous section, on defendant Ingham County Jail's motion, I will grant defendant City of Lansing's motion for judgment on the pleadings. ”

“ There are no allegations of this sort here.
Moreover, plaintiff also fails to allege any custom, practice, policy, or procedure of Ingham County or its sheriff which violated plaintiff's civil rights. Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) . A respondeat superior theory of liability will not suffice to state a claim, and without more, the action must be dismissed. ”

“ Id. at 3. Plaintiff returned to the capitol steps, and was first put in the police car and driven around, and later taken into custody, around midnight on that same day.4
At the State Capitol post, plaintiff was allegedly fingerprinted and photographed, informed in part of his rights, and turned over to the Lansing Police Department. Plaintiff says he was put into a cell with no bed or bedding, and held until about 3:00 p.m. on November 22, 1986. Plaintiff claims to have been deprived of food, warmth, and sleep, and was suffering withdrawal symptoms from certain drugs he was taking. ”

“ From this point, plaintiff provides a litany of events, basically steps taken after arrest and incarceration, including transfer to the Ingham County Jail on November 25, 1986 at about 6:00 p.m.; being put in a large holding cell ”

“ The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155, 158 (6th Cir. 1983) ; Amersbach v. City of Cleveland, 598 F.2d 1033, 1034-35 (6th Cir. 1979) ; Davis H. Elliot Co. v. Caribbean Utilities Co., 513 F.2d 1176 (6th Cir. 1975) . ”