United States Tax Court

Summary

United States Tax Court Erhard Seminars Training v. C.I.R. Docket Nos… (1986|noyearcat)

It is now clear that the responsible dissemination of the Body of Knowledge as rapidly as possible everywhere must take priority over any other purposes to be served. ERHARD has moved forward to make it possible for the Body of Knowledge to be controlled for the United States of America by an educational trust located in the British Commonwealth and for the rest of the world by an educational foundation established in Switzerland.
Source: Wikisource

United States Tax Court Erhard Seminars Training v. C.I.R. Docket Nos… (1986|noyearcat)

There is nothing in the record to explain the derivation or the nature of the interest in the property by these two entities. It is significant that both of these entities were among the so-called 'system entities' managed by individuals from the office of Margolis. There is no effort to explain why (apart from tax considerations) petitioner, which had just acquired the property with a loan from Barclays Bank of California, [13] would immediately embark on a transaction which did nothing except to engender an onerous (and inflated) monthly rental liability.
Source: Wikisource

United States Tax Court Erhard Seminars Training v. C.I.R. Docket Nos… (1986|noyearcat)

Petitioner's contention that the wardrobe expenses were undertaken for the business and not for the personal benefit of the employee is unpersuasive. There is no perceptible connection between the continuous expenditures over the years or Erhard's wardrobe and the business in which petitioner was engaged. The wardrobe expenses incurred by petitioner for Erhard consisted of ordinary, conventional items of clothing, i.e., shirts, slacks, jackets, sweaters, and shoes, which were undeniably suitable for general or personal wear.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature