United States Tax Court

Summary

United States Tax Court Est of Hawaii v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Docket No… (1979|noyearcat)

We agree with respondent. To accede to petitioner's claim that it has no connection with International is to ignore reality. While it may be true that they are not formally controlled by the same individuals, International exerts considerable control over petitioner's activities. It sets the tuition for the standard training and requires a minimum number of such trainings. It requires petitioner to conduct regular seminars and to host special events.
Source: Wikisource

United States Tax Court Est of Hawaii v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Docket No… (1979|noyearcat)

International is a corporation chartered in Tortola, British Virgin Islands, to engage in the development, promotion, sale, and licensing of industrial equipment, machinery, processes, and material, and of artistic and educational equipment, products and materials, television and motion pictures, records, cassettes, publications, and literary works. The royalty agreement provides for it to license its rights to the body of knowledge developed by Werner Erhard to tax-exempt organizations established in all the States under essentially identical terms and conditions.
Source: Wikisource

United States Tax Court Est of Hawaii v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Docket No… (1979|noyearcat)

Although the licensing agreement provides that contributions the licensee makes to est shall be compensated at fair market value (rather than at cost as in the agreement with International) and that the licensee shall pay its prorata share of the licensee's overhead (rather than one-half its proceeds as in the agreement with International) , petitioner has not satisfied us that the ultimate beneficiary of petitioner's activities is not for-profit corporations in whom the rights to 'est' ultimately reside.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature