Victor Mahillon and Kathleen Schlesinger

Summary

Victor Mahillon and Kathleen Schlesinger 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 7… (1911)

We must, however, regret from the point of view of art that its success has been so great, and that it has ended in usurping in brass bands the place of the bugles, the tone colour of which is infinitely preferable as a foundation for an ensemble composed entirely of brass instruments. Even the symphonic orchestra has not been secure from its intrusion, and the growing tendency in some orchestras, notably in France, to allow the cornet to supersede the trumpet, to the great detriment of tone colour, is to be deplored.
Source: Wikisource

Victor Mahillon and Kathleen Schlesinger 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 7… (1911)

The cup-shaped mouthpiece is larger than that of the trumpet; the shape of the cup in conjunction with the length of the tube and the proportions of the bore determines the timbre of the instrument. The outline of the bottom of the cup, where it communicates with the bore, is of the greatest importance. [17] If, as in the trumpet, it presents angles against which the column of air breaks, it produces a brilliant tone quality. In the cornet mouthpiece there are no angles at the bottom of the cup, which curves into the bore; hence the cornet’s loose, coarse quality of tone.
Source: Wikisource

Victor Mahillon and Kathleen Schlesinger 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 7… (1911)

The sound is produced by stretching the lips across the mouthpiece, and making them act as double reeds, set in vibration by the breath. There are no fixed notes on the cornet as in instruments with lateral holes, or with keys; the musical scale is obtained by means of the power the performer possesses—once he has learned how to use it—of producing the notes of the harmonic series by overblowing, i.e. by varying the tension of the lips and the pressure of breath.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature