Summary

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Palmore v. Sidoti — Opinion of the Court (1984)

It would ignore reality to suggest that racial and ethnic prejudices do not exist or that all manifestations of those prejudices have been eliminated. There is a risk that a child living with a stepparent of a different race may be subject to a variety of pressures and stresses not present if the child were living with parents of the same racial or ethnic origin.
The question, however, is whether the reality of private biases and the possible injury they might inflict are permissible considerations for removal of an infant child from the custody of its natural mother.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Warren E. Burger Warren E. Burger Palmore v. Sidoti — Opinion of the Court (1984)

Taking the court's findings and rationale at face value, it is clear that the outcome would have been different had petitioner married a Caucasian male of similar respectability.
A core purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to do away with all governmentally imposed [1] discrimination based on race. See Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 307-308, 310 (1880) .Classifying persons according to their race is more likely to reflect racial prejudice than legitimate public concerns; the race, not the person, dictates the category.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature