William John Sparrow Simpson

Summary

William John Sparrow Simpson Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility (1909)

And if many private individuals clamour greatly, and pour forth imprudent censures against them, yet neither the Catholic Church nor Rome itself passes any condemnation upon them. Three hundred years we have controverted it with impunity. Has the Church waited for peace and security down to this our age, until the seventeenth century is almost at an end? Plainly, then, the security of pious souls must rest in the consent of the Universal Church. It cannot be that they should acquiesce in the doubtful Infallibility of the Roman Pontiff.
Source: Wikisource

William John Sparrow Simpson Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility (1909)

Through all this crisis, the Sorbonne, the theological faculty of the University of Paris, was the strenuous advocate of the doctrine that the supreme authority in Christendom was the Council, not the Pope. They declared that things were come to such a pass, through the Schism, that on all sides men did not hesitate publicly to affirm that it was purely indifferent whether there were two Popes or twelve. Gerson, the celebrated Chancellor of the University of Paris, reassured men by asserting that the ultimate authority in Christendom was the entire Church and not the Pope.
Source: Wikisource

William John Sparrow Simpson Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility (1909)

For if he quotes Peter as an example for his allowing himself quietly and peacefully to be corrected by one junior colleague, how much more readily would he himself, with the Council of his Province, have yielded to the authority of the whole world, when the truth had been thus brought to light? For, indeed, so holy and peaceful a soul would have been more ready to assent to the arguments of any single person who could prove to him the truth
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature